Selective censorship
So, I was watching the Discovery Channel's new show, Dirty Jobs. On the show, the host was getting some on-the-job training in the art of horse breeding.
Like most of forms of life generation, it involved some fornication... artificial in this case.
What surprised me while watching the show, was that the producers had chosen to blur out the picture of the stallion's erect penis, but had not censored the mare's vagina.
Is female horse genitalia any less offensive than male horse genitalia? Does the FCC have any regulations on horse genitalia, as it does on human?
It seems to me that the females got the short end of the stick here. Not only were they exposed on national television, but they got none of the enjoyment out of the exercise, because the whole thing was artificial in the first place.
Anyone else find this odd?
Like most of forms of life generation, it involved some fornication... artificial in this case.
What surprised me while watching the show, was that the producers had chosen to blur out the picture of the stallion's erect penis, but had not censored the mare's vagina.
Is female horse genitalia any less offensive than male horse genitalia? Does the FCC have any regulations on horse genitalia, as it does on human?
It seems to me that the females got the short end of the stick here. Not only were they exposed on national television, but they got none of the enjoyment out of the exercise, because the whole thing was artificial in the first place.
Anyone else find this odd?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home