Friday, October 20, 2006

You might be a terrorist...

Here's the story of how yours truly became a potential terrorist:

I had the good fortune to be at Shea Stadium for their last win of the season. (If you're a Mets fan you know this was unfortunately Game 6, not Game 7, of the NLCS.)

I brought my camera with me, and took photos at the game. Then, I was on the 7 train back to Manhattan, the 1 train to Penn Station, and finally a NJ Transit train home (yes, I now realize I should have taken LIRR). My point is that I was on a bunch of trains.

If you're like me, trains will start to bore you. Sure there's people watching, I had my iPod (but an hour of consecutive Pac-Man games had drained the battery), but I was getting a bit bored. So, I had my digital camera in tow... decided to look through the lens and see if there was anything worth photographing.

So, I fiddled around with some close-up shots, long exposures, low-lighting situations... looking at things really small, really big... a creative exploration of my surroundings because... wait for it... I'm a "creative."

Try explaining that to the conductor who looms over you and motions for your camera.

Initially I thought he wanted me to take my feet off the seats (I was slouching and had my legs crossed on the seat next to me... I'll note: in a fashion in which I did not have my soles on the seat). I propped up. He motioned again for my lap. I thought this time he wanted my iPod off. Then I realized my camera was in my hands.

I naively thought... oh, a fellow artist. He must be interested in what kind of shots I was getting. (Note: The train was nearly empty, because it was the very last train of the night. He wasn't super busy and we had some time between stops. Logic tells me that he has time to converse with a passenger if you chooses.)

No. He wasn't interested in sharing f-stop stories. He wanted to know, "Why have you been taking pictures at every station we've stopped at?"

I thought for a second. I had taken a picture at the last station because there was a cool lighting situation across the platform. The spot was illuminating a corner of a bench and the yellow edge of the platform.

"I haven't been doing that."

"Well, I guess we've stopped in only two stations." (So, I guess I might have.)

"How do you see what photos were taken on this thing?"

Okay, we're no longer dealing with a fellow photographer here. I show him. I'm now elevated in my seat, guiding him through the camera's preview feature. I wasn't sure how I could explain what I was innocently trying to do.

"Okay, that's Penn Station, the train... that's Shea Stadium..." as he reached the end of the train photos. I had really only taken 6 or 7 photos up to this point.

"You can't take photos of train stations." he said. "Ever since they put planes into our towers you can't do that any more. Somebody saw you taking photos and said something. You gotta delete those photos." Prior to him saying that I actually offered up, "I can delete them if you want." (They were all probably blurred out from camera shake anyway.)

So, he leaves me to delete them (again, not a camera guy, he doesn't know how to do it)... and I do.

After he leaves the following thoughts cross my mind:

1: It's a good thing I'm not using film so I don't lose the Shea pictures.

2: Hey, who's to say I am not trying to blow up Shea Stadium if my camera's contents is evidence of my intent?

3: Are we really so fearful that someone would speak up about someone taking pictures of train stations? I guess I'm happy that I am a blue-eyed, blonde-haired, white potential terrorist. They certainly weren't profiling me.

4: What if I didn't delete the photos? Did they have a NJ Transit version of Guantanamo Bay to put me in? How long would it take me to get out of an interrogation because I lazily was snapping photos on the train? Would I have to lawyer up? Could I be the next poster boy for the ACLU?

5: Lastly, I bet I get flagged by some FBI terrorist search team for this post. I wonder if this is what it felt like if you liked the color red under McCarthyism?

Labels: ,

Sunday, October 01, 2006

NJ is Broken

Specifically the road system here in the Garden State is broken. As one of the state's newest residents I've noted a few things about this place that have started to get under my skin. Hopefully, divulging these things here will allow me to move past them and begin to try to find those other wonderful things about this state that makes natives swoon for it (besides gas prices, and the fact that you don't have to pump it yourself).

First up is a handicap parking spot in front of my building.


Now, I'm no handicapped person, but if I was, I think I might be better off in a regular parking spot than this joke of a space. As my friend Chris put it, "That handicapped parking spot is handicapped."

Next we have a sign that exists only a few hundred feet from that parking spot. When you look at it this way, it doesn't make any sense.


Take a good look in the distance and you'll notice that the roadway doesn't turn, nor have a diagonal intersection upcoming.

Come at the same sign from the other direction and you'll see:


Oh! A road that makes a 90 degree left hand turn, with a diagonal driveway at it's elbow!

Someone neglected to tell the maker of this sign, that the information only pertained to one flow of traffic (image #2). Thus, it is broken.

Broken point of transportation #3:

A traffic circle was just created where there should simply be a light or a stop sign. From this photo, can you tell what you are supposed to do if you want to go left at this intersection?


The funny thing here, is that this is thought to be an improvement over the previous traffic pattern, which would force the driver to make a right turn, go around a jug handle, and make a left hand turn at a stop light... instead of just making a left hand turn at this intersection.

This traffic circle (and most circles in NJ) are a problem, because people do not know how to drive in them. There is a need to yield to the traffic in the circle, yet most NJ drivers do not abide by that. It also creates a situation of constant merging and exiting, which in my mind, is a bigger potential for an accident than an ordinary four-way intersection.

New Jersey has a lot of people, and equally as many cars. So, it is not easy to thwart the problem of traffic in any area of the state. The DOT here is approaching the problem the wrong way, however. Drivers get frustrated by the inability to make left hand turns on major roads and the constant use of jug handles and exits on state roads. Roadways that are intended to keep traffic flowing, instead make the entire trip longer.

In my opinion, NJ would benefit from more local roads, making it easier for locals to use their own back-roads to avoid major highways, center turn lanes (instead of medians), and conventional traffic lights, with left hand turn lanes that allow for more driver understanding.

More traffic lights would also allow for shorter open stretches of multi-lane highways which encourages drag racing and speeding. Center turn lanes would also allow for emergency personnel to make U-turns and left hand turns more efficiently when needed, shortening their trips, and getting them to an accident scene, hospital, or speeding car more efficiently.

Fhew... okay, I'm done. For now.

Labels: ,